LGHT vs. COMT
LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Langar, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. LGHT is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, LGHT returned -11.86% vs 32.33% for COMT. Their -0.08 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LGHT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
LGHT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGHT achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 29.71% return.
LGHT
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- -11.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.07%
COMT
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.37M | $10.68M | $14.03M | |
| $39.55K | $23.01K | $17.27K |
LGHT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF | -11.21% | -1.66% | 0.23% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 29.71% | 6.07% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGHT and COMT is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2024 | -0.08 |
The correlation between LGHT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGHT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
LGHT
COMT
LGHT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGHT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.27 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.85 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 5.74 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGHT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGHT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -51.89% | +23.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.57% | -17.57% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.17% | -11.61% | -8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -23.90% | +15.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.65% | 5.65% | +8.00% |
Volatility
LGHT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.28%. This indicates that LGHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGHT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 5.28% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 19.54% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 21.66% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 21.10% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 18.86% | +0.61% |
LGHT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGHT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGHT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
LGHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.97% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGHT and COMT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGHT has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to COMT (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGHT dropped -28.60% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 32.33% vs -11.86% for LGHT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 32.33% return vs -11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGHT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 0.00% for LGHT.
LGHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Langar and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGHT and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGHT and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer