LGH vs. TOLZ
LGH (HCM Defender 500 Index ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGH is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 500 Index, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGH returned 10.02%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for TOLZ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGH charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
LGH vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGH achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return.
LGH
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
LGH vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | 0.69% | 19.47% | 27.00% | 24.19% | -27.37% | 39.92% | 18.51% | 11.10% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.09% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 5.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGH and TOLZ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LGH and TOLZ has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGH vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
LGH
TOLZ
LGH vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGH | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.17 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 9.16 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGH vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGH drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGH and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGH | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -39.33% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -5.18% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -11.94% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -21.85% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -2.45% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -6.61% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 1.79% | +1.80% |
Volatility
LGH vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that LGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGH | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 3.24% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 8.30% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | 10.41% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 13.98% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 16.23% | +3.63% |
LGH vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGH has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGH vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
LGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.63% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.63% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGH and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGH has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGH dropped -29.60% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 5-year performance, LGH leads with 10.02% vs 8.72% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LGH has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for LGH.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.38% for LGH.
LGH is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. LGH tracks HCM Defender 500 Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for LGH and 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGH and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer