PortfoliosLab logo
LGH vs. QQH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LGH and QQH is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LGH vs. QQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LGH:

11.06%

QQH:

11.99%

Max Drawdown

LGH:

-0.79%

QQH:

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

LGH:

-0.40%

QQH:

-0.28%

Returns By Period


LGH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGH vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGH has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGH vs. QQH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LGH is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LGH is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LGH is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LGH is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LGH is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LGH is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QQH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQH is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQH is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQH is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQH is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQH is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQH is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LGH vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LGH vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGH nor QQH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LGH vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGH drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, which is greater than QQH's maximum drawdown of -0.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGH and QQH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LGH vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...