LGH vs. AFOS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LGH (HCM Defender 500 Index ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LGH is passively managed, while AFOS is actively managed. Over the past year, LGH returned 17.02% vs 64.93% for AFOS. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LGH charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

LGH vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 27.82% return.

LGH

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 1.93%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.08%

AFOS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.57%
• 6M: 16.56%
• YTD: 27.82%
• 1Y: 64.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 66.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	$478.32K	$472.43K	$519.92K
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF	$1.20M	$1.69M	$1.63M

LGH vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF	3.14%	17.16%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	27.82%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LGH and AFOS is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.81

The correlation between LGH and AFOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGH vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGH

LGH Risk / Return Rank: 34
LGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LGH Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LGH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

AFOS

AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 94
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGH vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGH	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.72	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	3.44	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.44	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	5.34	-4.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	20.21	-16.40

LGH vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the AFOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGH and AFOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGH vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGH drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGH and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGH	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.60%	-11.80%	-17.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-11.80%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-6.55%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-1.80%	-7.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	3.11%	+0.64%

Volatility

LGH vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) is 5.17%, while ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that LGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGH	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	8.33%	-3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	19.47%	-6.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	23.16%	-6.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	22.37%	-5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.82%	22.37%	-2.55%

LGH vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGH has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGH vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

LGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF	0.37%	0.38%	0.40%	0.63%	0.61%	0.14%	0.23%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGH and AFOS in my portfolio?

LGH and AFOS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGH or AFOS?

AFOS has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to LGH (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGH dropped -29.60% vs AFOS's -11.80%.

Which ETF is better, LGH or AFOS?

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 64.93% vs 17.02% for LGH. On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, LGH has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGH or AFOS?

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 64.93% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGH or AFOS?

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for LGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGH or AFOS?

LGH has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between LGH and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for LGH and 0.45% for AFOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.