LGGG.L vs. IARCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and IARCX (Invesco Real Estate Fund) are both funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IARCX is a REIT fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for IARCX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for IARCX.

Performance

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while IARCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IARCX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than IARCX's 11.01% return.

LGGG.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 27.26%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 13.23%
• 10Y*: —

IARCX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 3.45%
• 5Y*: 1.66%
• 10Y*: 4.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.12%	12.92%	21.13%	18.08%	-8.24%	23.53%	12.41%	22.99%	-4.89%
IARCX Invesco Real Estate Fund	11.01%	-7.97%	2.79%	2.55%	-16.53%	41.13%	-14.28%	21.69%	-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGG.L and IARCX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018	0.30

The correlation between LGGG.L and IARCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGGG.L vs. IARCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGG.L

LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

IARCX

IARCX Risk / Return Rank: 9
IARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
IARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
IARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
IARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGGG.L	IARCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	0.72	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	1.05	+2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.13	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	1.25	+2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.19	3.20	+12.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the IARCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGG.L and IARCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGGG.L	IARCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	0.72	+1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.09	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.22	+0.70

Drawdowns

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum IARCX drawdown of -53.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and IARCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGGG.L	IARCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.38%	-53.88%	+28.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-7.43%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.68%	-18.38%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.68%	-30.34%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-13.61%	+13.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-11.89%	+8.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	2.90%	-1.22%

Volatility

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while Invesco Real Estate Fund (IARCX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IARCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGGG.L	IARCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	3.41%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	9.73%	-2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	12.94%	-2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.19%	17.63%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	20.71%	-5.62%

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IARCX's 1.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGGG.L vs. IARCX - Dividend Comparison

LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IARCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IARCX Invesco Real Estate Fund	4.65%	5.26%	3.66%	2.50%	9.87%	4.94%	6.58%	7.98%	6.65%	5.22%	14.83%	16.26%
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGGG.L and IARCX in my portfolio?

LGGG.L and IARCX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.