LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both Global Equities funds - LGGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while FWRG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGGG.L returned 27.26% vs 31.35% for FWRG.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRG.L.

Performance

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while FWRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than FWRG.L's 12.38% return.

LGGG.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 27.26%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 13.23%
• 10Y*: —

FWRG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.33%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.12%	12.92%	21.13%	8.11%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	12.37%	5.73%	22.20%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGG.L and FWRG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.82

The correlation between LGGG.L and FWRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGGG.L	FWRG.L
Technology	28.4%	29.1%
Financial Services	15.9%	16.4%
Industrials	10.9%	11.0%
Communication Services	9.7%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.0%
Energy	4.0%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.9%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGG.L

LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGGG.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.45	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.23	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.44	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	4.66	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.19	12.25	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGG.L and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGGG.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	2.45	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.10	-0.18

Drawdowns

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGGG.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.38%	-22.64%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-6.70%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.12%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-4.29%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	2.55%	-0.87%

Volatility

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGGG.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	3.57%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	9.19%	-1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	12.72%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.19%	14.76%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	14.76%	+0.33%

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGGG.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGGG.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGGG.L and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

LGGG.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGGG.L or FWRG.L?

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGGG.L or FWRG.L?

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRG.L.

What is the main difference between LGGG.L and FWRG.L?

LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.15% for FWRG.L.