PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGA.DE achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return.


LGGA.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.57%
YTD
17.67%
6M
17.01%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10Y*

IQQT.DE

1D
-1.61%
1M
14.31%
YTD
70.08%
6M
75.07%
1Y
111.86%
3Y*
40.38%
5Y*
22.82%
10Y*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
17.67%21.16%9.89%5.48%-3.83%1.07%
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
70.08%17.20%30.72%24.49%-25.21%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.58

The correlation between LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGA.DE
LGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQT.DE
IQQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGA.DEIQQT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.72

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

12.46

-8.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

35.53

-24.37

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGA.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

4.62

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Drawdowns

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum IQQT.DE drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGA.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-57.60%

+39.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.93%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-31.65%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-1.61%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-12.71%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.14%

-0.02%

Volatility

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) is 4.89%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that LGGA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGA.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

10.13%

-5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

19.53%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

24.10%

-9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

21.89%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

20.80%

-7.03%

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGGA.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than IQQT.DE's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.89%1.51%1.36%2.17%3.61%1.31%1.80%2.17%2.76%2.74%2.91%3.26%
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.76%4.29%4.70%5.40%4.98%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

LGGA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LGGA.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGA.DE and IQQT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer