PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGGA.DE is traded in EUR, while IASP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IASP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGA.DE achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than IASP.L's -6.84% return.


LGGA.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.57%
YTD
17.67%
6M
17.01%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10Y*

IASP.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-6.84%
6M
-6.12%
1Y
0.73%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
-4.73%
10Y*
-1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
17.67%21.16%9.89%5.48%-3.83%1.07%
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
-6.84%11.09%-7.52%-9.01%-9.80%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGA.DE and IASP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.54

The correlation between LGGA.DE and IASP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGA.DE
LGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IASP.L
IASP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IASP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IASP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IASP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IASP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IASP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGA.DEIASP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.02

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

0.06

+3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

0.17

+10.99

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the IASP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGA.DE and IASP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGA.DEIASP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.06

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.06

+0.79

Drawdowns

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum IASP.L drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGA.DE and IASP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGA.DEIASP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-66.95%

+49.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-13.19%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-17.26%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-33.01%

+31.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-24.29%

+19.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

4.26%

-1.14%

Volatility

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) at 3.50%. This indicates that LGGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IASP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGA.DEIASP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.50%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

8.72%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

11.65%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

12.29%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

14.86%

-1.09%

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IASP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGGA.DE vs. IASP.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than IASP.L's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.76%4.29%4.70%5.40%4.98%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGA.DE and IASP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.

LGGA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IASP.L is REIT. LGGA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality, while IASP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LGGA.DE and 0.59% for IASP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGA.DE and IASP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer