LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE
LGGA.DE (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and BOLD.DE (21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality, while BOLD.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by 21Shares. LGGA.DE is passively managed, while BOLD.DE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LGGA.DE returned 18.10%/yr vs 24.50%/yr for BOLD.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGGA.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BOLD.DE.
Performance
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGA.DE is traded in EUR, while BOLD.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOLD.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGA.DE achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than BOLD.DE's -5.66% return.
LGGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 34.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOLD.DE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGA.DE L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 17.67% | 21.16% | 9.89% | 5.48% | -3.90% |
BOLD.DE 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP | -5.66% | 11.16% | 67.20% | 29.02% | -10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGA.DE and BOLD.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGGA.DE
BOLD.DE
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGA.DE | BOLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.02 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 0.03 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 0.07 | +11.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGA.DE | BOLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 0.02 | +2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.95 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than BOLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGA.DE and BOLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGA.DE | BOLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -15.60% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.87% | -14.30% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -14.30% | -3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -14.30% | +12.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.09% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 6.09% | -2.97% |
Volatility
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) is 4.89%, while 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that LGGA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGA.DE | BOLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 5.39% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 19.13% | -7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 23.07% | -8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 19.87% | -6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 19.87% | -6.10% |
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOLD.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGGA.DE vs. BOLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while BOLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOLD.DE 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGGA.DE L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 3.76% | 4.29% | 4.70% | 5.40% | 4.98% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGA.DE and BOLD.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BOLD.DE.
LGGA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BOLD.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LGGA.DE and 0.65% for BOLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGGA.DE and BOLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer