PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGA.DE achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than 18MM.DE's 2.24% return.


LGGA.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.57%
YTD
17.67%
6M
17.01%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10Y*

18MM.DE

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.73%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
17.67%21.16%9.89%5.48%-3.83%1.07%
18MM.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR
2.24%0.05%5.93%1.38%-7.30%4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.71

The correlation between LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGA.DE
LGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

18MM.DE
18MM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
18MM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
18MM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGA.DE18MM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.02

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

0.17

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

0.42

+10.74

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the 18MM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGA.DE18MM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.08

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.30

+0.43

Drawdowns

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum 18MM.DE drawdown of -36.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGA.DE18MM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-36.82%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-6.51%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-18.52%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-5.39%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-7.83%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.58%

+0.54%

Volatility

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) at 3.57%. This indicates that LGGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGA.DE18MM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.57%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

10.29%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

13.51%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

14.97%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

16.60%

-2.83%

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than 18MM.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGGA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while 18MM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
18MM.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.76%4.29%4.70%5.40%4.98%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 18MM.DE.

LGGA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality, while 18MM.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LGGA.DE and 0.45% for 18MM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGA.DE and 18MM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer