18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE
18MM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR) and PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - 18MM.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB while PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 18MM.DE returned 1.50%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAC.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 18MM.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PAC.DE.
Performance
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MM.DE achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than PAC.DE's 8.00% return.
18MM.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18MM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR | 2.24% | 0.05% | 5.93% | 1.38% | -7.30% | 14.57% | -5.45% | 21.40% | -6.44% | 10.50% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MM.DE and PAC.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.91 |
The correlation between 18MM.DE and PAC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
18MM.DE
PAC.DE
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 18MM.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 2.00 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 5.65 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 18MM.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 1.08 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.41 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.82%, roughly equal to the maximum PAC.DE drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MM.DE and PAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MM.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.82% | -36.90% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -6.33% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.52% | -20.21% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.20% | -20.21% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -2.33% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.10% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.25% | +0.33% |
Volatility
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) at 3.19%. This indicates that 18MM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 18MM.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.19% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 8.91% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 11.77% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 16.52% | +0.08% |
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MM.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PAC.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
18MM.DE vs. PAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MM.DE nor PAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
18MM.DE and PAC.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 18MM.DE.
18MM.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB, while PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 18MM.DE and 0.16% for PAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for 18MM.DE and PAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer