PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGCYX vs. LALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGCYX
Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund
-6.41%21.73%17.83%23.59%-18.91%2.29%23.72%26.72%-9.34%18.55%
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
-0.24%5.70%4.48%4.76%-5.48%1.17%2.98%5.42%1.24%1.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGCYX achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than LALDX's -0.24% return.


LGCYX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
-6.41%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*

LALDX

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.98%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGCYX vs. LALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGCYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LALDX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGCYX vs. LALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGCYX
LGCYX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LGCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LGCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LALDX
LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGCYXLALDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.82

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

3.07

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.57

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

3.57

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

14.42

-9.19

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGCYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the LALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGCYX and LALDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGCYXLALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.82

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.73

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.28

-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between LGCYX and LALDX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Dividend Comparison

LGCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than LALDX's 4.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGCYX
Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund
0.77%0.72%0.65%1.06%0.96%1.07%5.07%1.34%5.46%5.85%0.00%0.00%
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.62%5.01%4.11%4.09%2.42%2.37%2.88%3.59%3.88%3.71%3.95%3.95%

Drawdowns

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGCYX drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, which is greater than LALDX's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCYX and LALDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGCYXLALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-10.58%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-1.29%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-7.60%

-28.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-1.03%

-8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-0.82%

-7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

0.32%

+2.28%

Volatility

LGCYX vs. LALDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) at 0.71%. This indicates that LGCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGCYXLALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

0.71%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

1.66%

+8.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

2.39%

+14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

2.64%

+15.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

2.58%

+15.68%