LFTHX vs. MFEKX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX).

LFTHX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 2, 2021. MFEKX is an actively managed fund by MFS. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012.

Performance

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund	-2.64%	16.16%	13.28%	17.00%	-16.00%	1.95%
MFEKX MFS Growth R6	-13.60%	12.44%	49.62%	36.27%	-31.07%	1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFTHX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than MFEKX's -13.60% return.

LFTHX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: -2.64%
• 6M: -0.97%
• 1Y: 13.21%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFEKX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -9.05%
• YTD: -13.60%
• 6M: -14.18%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.

MFEKX

MFS Growth R6

LFTHX

MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund

Return for Risk

LFTHX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFTHX

LFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 46
LFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
LFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

MFEKX

MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 12
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFTHX	MFEKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	0.31	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	0.59	+0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.08	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	0.22	+0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	0.76	+4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFTHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFTHX and MFEKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFTHX	MFEKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	0.31	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.80	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between LFTHX and MFEKX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

LFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than MFEKX's 17.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund	5.21%	5.08%	3.63%	2.18%	4.02%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFEKX MFS Growth R6	17.15%	14.82%	25.31%	4.82%	1.04%	2.74%	3.55%	1.57%	3.88%	2.49%	1.70%	3.64%

Drawdowns

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFTHX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum MFEKX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFTHX and MFEKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFTHX	MFEKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.48%	-36.06%	+12.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-17.27%	+6.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.32%	-17.27%	+8.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-5.66%	-0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	5.05%	-2.69%

Volatility

LFTHX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) is 4.06%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that LFTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFTHX	MFEKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	5.57%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	12.05%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	21.56%	-7.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.33%	21.86%	-7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.33%	21.12%	-6.79%