LFTHX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFTHX (MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, LFTHX returned 16.93%/yr vs 22.00%/yr for FQLSX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFTHX achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 14.07% return.

LFTHX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FQLSX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund	10.66%	16.16%	13.28%	17.00%	-16.00%	1.95%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	14.07%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LFTHX and FQLSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021	0.97

The correlation between LFTHX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LFTHX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFTHX

LFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 52
LFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFTHX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.54	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.50	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	3.36	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	14.85	-3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFTHX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFTHX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.54	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.78	-0.20

Drawdowns

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFTHX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFTHX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFTHX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.48%	-31.26%	+7.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-9.48%	+1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.57%	-15.37%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-5.43%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.14%	-0.19%

Volatility

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) is 2.91%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that LFTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFTHX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	4.13%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	10.29%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	12.54%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	15.12%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.27%	16.08%	-1.81%

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LFTHX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

LFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, which matches FQLSX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.59%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund	4.59%	5.08%	3.63%	2.18%	4.02%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFTHX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LFTHX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LFTHX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to LFTHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFTHX dropped -23.48% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.