LFTHX vs. FFFAX
LFTHX (MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund) and FFFAX (Fidelity Freedom Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, LFTHX returned 16.93%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for FFFAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFTHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FFFAX.
Performance
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFTHX achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than FFFAX's 4.96% return.
LFTHX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFFAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund | 10.66% | 16.16% | 13.28% | 17.00% | -16.00% | 1.95% |
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund | 4.96% | 10.42% | 4.34% | 8.18% | -11.33% | -0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFTHX and FFFAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between LFTHX and FFFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFTHX vs. FFFAX — Risk / Return Rank
LFTHX
FFFAX
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFTHX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.57 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.76 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.19 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.40 | 14.02 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFTHX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.57 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.05 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFTHX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, which is greater than FFFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFTHX and FFFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFTHX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -17.96% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -3.68% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | -4.91% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -1.79% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 0.83% | +1.12% |
Volatility
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund (LFTHX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) at 1.86%. This indicates that LFTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFTHX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 1.86% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 3.87% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 4.57% | +5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 5.37% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 4.64% | +9.63% |
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFTHX vs. FFFAX - Dividend Comparison
LFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than FFFAX's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund | 2.97% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 2.92% | 5.89% | 6.12% | 4.37% | 3.65% | 5.17% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 3.28% |
LFTHX MFS Lifetime 2065 Fund | 4.59% | 5.08% | 3.63% | 2.18% | 4.02% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFTHX and FFFAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFTHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FFFAX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFTHX dropped -23.48% vs FFFAX's -17.96%.
FFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFTHX and FFFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer