PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFRIX vs. OOSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRIX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than OOSAX's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LFRIX has outperformed OOSAX with an annualized return of 4.56%, while OOSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.63% annualized return.


LFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.56%

OOSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
1.65%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
-0.83%3.78%7.76%10.67%-0.94%8.66%-4.46%2.36%-0.86%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRIX and OOSAX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between LFRIX and OOSAX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFRIX vs. OOSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSAX
OOSAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
OOSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFRIXOOSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.03

1.19

+0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

0.56

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

1.21

+14.18

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the OOSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRIX and OOSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, smaller than the maximum OOSAX drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRIX and OOSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFRIXOOSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-32.12%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-3.23%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-3.23%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-6.52%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

-23.53%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.57%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-2.15%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.42%

-1.01%

Volatility

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) is 0.65%, while Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that LFRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFRIXOOSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.86%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

1.94%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.99%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

3.61%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

4.13%

-0.22%

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFRIX vs. OOSAX - Dividend Comparison

LFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than OOSAX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.90%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
5.18%6.68%8.38%7.76%7.42%4.37%4.84%5.24%4.65%4.08%4.78%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFRIX and OOSAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OOSAX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to LFRIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRIX dropped -27.90% vs OOSAX's -32.12%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFRIX and OOSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer