LFRAX vs. RCRIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFRAX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A) and RCRIX (RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 5 years, LFRAX returned 5.27%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for RCRIX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LFRAX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RCRIX.

Performance

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LFRAX having a 1.82% return and RCRIX slightly higher at 1.91%.

LFRAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 4.37%

RCRIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 5.18%
• 3Y*: 7.58%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFRAX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A	1.82%	6.09%	8.07%	11.89%	-3.00%	5.16%	-1.69%	7.37%	-0.20%	2.40%
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund	1.91%	5.56%	10.01%	9.85%	-0.72%	2.81%	-8.51%	4.46%	59.17%	3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRAX and RCRIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.13

Return for Risk

LFRAX vs. RCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFRAX

LFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
LFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RCRIX

RCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 100
RCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
RCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
RCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
RCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
RCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFRAX	RCRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	6.73	-4.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.52	19.90	-13.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.11	8.37	-6.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	27.45	-23.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.40	171.13	-155.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is lower than the RCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 6.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRAX and RCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFRAX	RCRIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	6.73	-4.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.86	3.35	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	1.08	-0.02

Drawdowns

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRAX drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, roughly equal to the maximum RCRIX drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRAX and RCRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFRAX	RCRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.54%	-30.00%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.46%	-0.19%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.61%	-1.93%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.41%	-3.75%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-3.01%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.03%	+0.38%

Volatility

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that LFRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFRAX	RCRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	0.21%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	0.60%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34%	0.77%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.84%	1.60%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.88%	7.93%	-4.05%

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than RCRIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFRAX vs. RCRIX - Dividend Comparison

LFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than RCRIX's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFRAX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A	6.69%	7.00%	7.49%	7.47%	3.81%	3.83%	4.43%	5.51%	5.40%	4.46%	4.45%	4.52%
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund	4.95%	5.30%	6.85%	7.90%	3.80%	2.34%	3.16%	3.36%	49.16%	3.64%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFRAX and RCRIX in my portfolio?

LFRAX and RCRIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFRAX or RCRIX?

LFRAX has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to RCRIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRAX dropped -28.54% vs RCRIX's -30.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.73 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.