PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFRAX vs. LSYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRAX achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than LSYAX's 1.63% return.


LFRAX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.12%
6M
2.30%
YTD
2.34%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
4.27%
ALL TIME*
3.87%

LSYAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.93%
6M
0.77%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LFRAX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A
2.34%6.09%8.07%11.89%-3.00%5.16%13.30%
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.63%7.50%8.46%10.60%-7.21%4.50%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRAX and LSYAX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020

0.60

The correlation between LFRAX and LSYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFRAX vs. LSYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFRAX
LFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LSYAX
LSYAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LSYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LSYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFRAXLSYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.37

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

2.02

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

9.27

+4.37

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the LSYAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRAX and LSYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRAX drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, which is greater than LSYAX's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRAX and LSYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFRAXLSYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-10.79%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.84%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.61%

-5.30%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.41%

-10.79%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.03%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-1.83%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.62%

-0.21%

Volatility

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A (LFRAX) is 0.40%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that LFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFRAXLSYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

0.51%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

2.89%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

3.56%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.85%

4.30%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.88%

4.17%

-0.29%

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LSYAX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFRAX vs. LSYAX - Dividend Comparison

LFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than LSYAX's 7.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRAX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A
6.05%7.00%7.49%7.47%3.81%3.83%4.43%5.51%5.40%4.46%4.45%4.52%
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
7.29%7.91%8.01%6.38%4.86%5.77%4.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFRAX and LSYAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSYAX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to LFRAX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRAX dropped -28.54% vs LSYAX's -10.79%.

LFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFRAX and LSYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer