PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFMIX vs. HFGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFMIX achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than HFGM's 13.73% return.


LFMIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.52%
1Y
15.13%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
4.15%

HFGM

1D
-1.06%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
13.73%
6M
13.65%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
10.03%5.60%
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
13.73%26.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LFMIX and HFGM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFMIX vs. HFGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFMIX
LFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
LFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HFGM
HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFMIXHFGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.29

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

3.48

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.72

9.32

+9.40

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the HFGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFMIX and HFGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFMIXHFGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.64

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.75

-1.39

Drawdowns

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFMIX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than HFGM's maximum drawdown of -10.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFMIX and HFGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFMIXHFGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-10.66%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-10.66%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-6.29%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-2.69%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

3.97%

-3.16%

Volatility

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) is 1.26%, while Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that LFMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFMIXHFGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

4.36%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

17.44%

-13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

22.58%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

21.74%

-14.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.61%

21.74%

-14.13%

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFMIX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HFGM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFMIX vs. HFGM - Dividend Comparison

LFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than HFGM's 9.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
9.88%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
2.85%3.14%3.21%3.17%14.35%4.95%4.73%4.66%3.12%5.89%1.95%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFMIX and HFGM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFGM has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to LFMIX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFMIX dropped -22.68% vs HFGM's -10.66%.

LFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFMIX and HFGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer