PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFIBX vs. MIEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B (LFIBX) and MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFIBX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than MIEIX's 3.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LFIBX having a 10.11% annualized return and MIEIX not far behind at 9.76%.


LFIBX

1D
0.46%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.11%
6M
10.47%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
10.11%

MIEIX

1D
0.67%
1M
0.67%
YTD
3.20%
6M
5.41%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFIBX
MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B
10.11%15.11%12.05%15.69%-16.49%19.19%12.15%26.62%-8.87%20.03%
MIEIX
MFS International Equity Fund Class R6
3.20%23.22%4.13%19.06%-14.82%15.13%11.11%28.42%-10.66%28.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LFIBX and MIEIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.85

The correlation between LFIBX and MIEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFIBX vs. MIEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFIBX
LFIBX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LFIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LFIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MIEIX
MIEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MIEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MIEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B (LFIBX) and MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFIBXMIEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

0.84

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

2.97

+7.20

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MIEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFIBX and MIEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFIBXMIEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.72

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.46

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.46

+0.21

Drawdowns

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFIBX drawdown since its inception was -32.85%, smaller than the maximum MIEIX drawdown of -53.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFIBX and MIEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFIBXMIEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.85%

-53.13%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-11.26%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-13.43%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.85%

-28.07%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.85%

-31.35%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.53%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-8.98%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.20%

-1.22%

Volatility

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B (LFIBX) is 2.93%, while MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that LFIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFIBXMIEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.43%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

10.24%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

13.14%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

15.34%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

15.94%

-1.00%

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFIBX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MIEIX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFIBX vs. MIEIX - Dividend Comparison

LFIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than MIEIX's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFIBX
MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B
4.91%5.40%3.42%2.35%5.13%7.01%1.39%3.62%2.43%1.84%1.85%1.34%
MIEIX
MFS International Equity Fund Class R6
2.59%2.68%1.47%1.67%1.26%5.40%1.00%3.12%1.63%1.85%1.78%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFIBX and MIEIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIEIX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to LFIBX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFIBX dropped -32.85% vs MIEIX's -53.13%.

LFIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFIBX and MIEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer