PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. YETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGY vs. YETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than YETH's -37.76% return.


LFGY

1D
4.44%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
14.39%
6M
4.19%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YETH

1D
6.84%
1M
-26.20%
YTD
-37.76%
6M
-37.20%
1Y
-32.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. YETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and YETH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.67

The correlation between LFGY and YETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. YETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

YETH
YETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
YETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. YETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFGYYETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.94

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

-0.55

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

-1.03

+1.33

LFGY vs. YETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the YETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and YETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFGYYETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.56

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.55

+0.63

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. YETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum YETH drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and YETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYYETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-64.41%

+28.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-58.73%

+22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.62%

-61.97%

+49.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-31.13%

+17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

31.51%

-15.03%

Volatility

LFGY vs. YETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 12.43%, while Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGYYETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

17.00%

-4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.17%

40.48%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.80%

58.59%

-20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.36%

56.22%

-13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.36%

56.22%

-13.86%

LFGY vs. YETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFGY vs. YETH - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.87%, less than YETH's 153.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFGY and YETH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YETH has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to LFGY (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs YETH's -64.41%.

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 4.87% vs -32.39% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 12.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 4.87% return vs -32.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.

YETH has the higher dividend yield at 153.07%, compared with 82.87% for LFGY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LFGY and 0.95% for YETH.

LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGY and YETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer