LFGY vs. YETH
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned 4.87% vs -32.39% for YETH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YETH.
Performance
LFGY vs. YETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than YETH's -37.76% return.
LFGY
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YETH
- 1D
- 6.84%
- 1M
- -26.20%
- YTD
- -37.76%
- 6M
- -37.20%
- 1Y
- -32.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY vs. YETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 14.39% | -8.18% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -37.76% | -31.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and YETH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.67 |
The correlation between LFGY and YETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. YETH — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
YETH
LFGY vs. YETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFGY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.55 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | -1.03 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFGY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | -0.56 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.55 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. YETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum YETH drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and YETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -64.41% | +28.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -58.73% | +22.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -61.97% | +49.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -31.13% | +17.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 31.51% | -15.03% |
Volatility
LFGY vs. YETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 12.43%, while Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.43% | 17.00% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.17% | 40.48% | -9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.80% | 58.59% | -20.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.36% | 56.22% | -13.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.36% | 56.22% | -13.86% |
LFGY vs. YETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFGY vs. YETH - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.87%, less than YETH's 153.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 82.87% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 153.07% | 109.12% | 20.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and YETH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YETH has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to LFGY (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs YETH's -64.41%.
On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 4.87% vs -32.39% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 12.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 4.87% return vs -32.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.
YETH has the higher dividend yield at 153.07%, compared with 82.87% for LFGY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LFGY and 0.95% for YETH.
LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and YETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer