LFGY vs. TSMY
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned -0.86% vs 60.64% for TSMY. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TSMY.
Performance
LFGY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 30.47% return.
LFGY
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- -0.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.36%
TSMY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- YTD
- 30.47%
- 1Y
- 60.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 42.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $957.02K | $905.59K | $1.33M | |
| $2.14M | $3.13M | $3.04M |
LFGY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 6.34% | -9.35% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.47% | 40.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and TSMY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LFGY and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
TSMY
LFGY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 3.20 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 10.72 | -11.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -31.15% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -17.86% | -18.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.77% | -11.66% | -7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -5.63% | -8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.27% | 5.33% | +11.94% |
Volatility
LFGY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 11.98%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.26% | 11.98% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 27.90% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.62% | 33.77% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 34.64% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 34.64% | +7.96% |
LFGY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFGY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.75%, more than TSMY's 58.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.75% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 58.31% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and TSMY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to TSMY (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 60.64% vs -0.86% for LFGY. On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 11.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 60.64% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.75%, compared with 58.31% for TSMY.
Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 1.01% for TSMY.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer