LFGY vs. PLTY
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned 8.63% vs 5.94% for PLTY. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
LFGY vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -13.94% return.
LFGY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 8.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 6M
- -15.13%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 17.68% | -8.18% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -13.94% | 100.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and PLTY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between LFGY and PLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
PLTY
LFGY vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFGY | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.17 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | 0.33 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFGY | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.14 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 1.25 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTY drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and PLTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -36.61% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -34.41% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.11% | -25.36% | +15.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -12.80% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.43% | 17.79% | -1.36% |
Volatility
LFGY vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 10.49%, while YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a volatility of 14.16%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | 14.16% | -3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.08% | 32.34% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.07% | 43.49% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.90% | 52.88% | -10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.90% | 52.88% | -10.98% |
LFGY vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LFGY and PLTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
LFGY vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.56%, less than PLTY's 112.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 82.56% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 112.23% | 112.44% | 7.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and PLTY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTY has higher volatility (14.16%) compared to LFGY (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs PLTY's -36.61%.
On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 8.63% vs 5.94% for PLTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 10.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 8.63% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LFGY and PLTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 112.23%, compared with 82.56% for LFGY.
LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and PLTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer