LFGY vs. IVVW

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. LFGY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned -13.47% vs 17.31% for IVVW. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.

Performance

LFGY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 6.01% return.

LFGY

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -10.57%
• 6M: -5.78%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 1Y: -13.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVVW

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 6.01%
• 1Y: 17.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	4.57%	-9.35%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	6.01%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and IVVW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.66

The correlation between LFGY and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFGY vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFGY	IVVW
Financial Services	57.8%	11.0%
Technology	33.5%	38.4%
Communication Services	5.4%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Industrials	-	7.9%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 6
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 83
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFGY	IVVW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	2.11	-2.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	2.91	-3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.44	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	2.99	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	15.82	-16.61

LFGY vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and IVVW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	IVVW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-16.79%	-19.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	-5.81%	-30.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-1.12%	-19.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.05%	-1.69%	-12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.17%	1.10%	+16.07%

Volatility

LFGY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 2.61%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	IVVW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.65%	2.61%	+8.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.14%	7.13%	+25.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.28%	8.23%	+31.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.20%	12.57%	+29.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.20%	12.57%	+29.63%

LFGY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.47%, more than IVVW's 19.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.20%	18.55%	13.72%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	88.47%	94.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGY and IVVW in my portfolio?

LFGY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFGY or IVVW?

LFGY has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to IVVW (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

Which ETF is better, LFGY or IVVW?

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 17.31% vs -13.47% for LFGY. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFGY or IVVW?

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 17.31% return vs -13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFGY or IVVW?

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFGY or IVVW?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 88.47%, compared with 19.20% for IVVW.

What is the main difference between LFGY and IVVW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.25% for IVVW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.