LFGY vs. GPIX
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned 9.36% vs 24.71% for GPIX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
LFGY vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 9.41% return.
LFGY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 18.74% | -9.35% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.41% | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and GPIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between LFGY and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
GPIX
LFGY vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.44 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 3.22 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 15.72 | -15.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -17.50% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -7.71% | -28.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -0.93% | -8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -1.48% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.62% | 1.58% | +15.04% |
Volatility
LFGY vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.04%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.33% | 4.04% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.32% | 8.65% | +22.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.56% | 10.75% | +27.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 13.87% | +28.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 13.87% | +28.51% |
LFGY vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFGY vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.45%, more than GPIX's 8.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.03% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 79.45% | 94.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and GPIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to GPIX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 24.71% vs 9.36% for LFGY. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 24.71% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 79.45%, compared with 8.03% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer