LFGY vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

LFGY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 356.51% return.

LFGY

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 18.74%
• 6M: 12.89%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -8.12%
• 1M: 40.26%
• YTD: 356.51%
• 6M: 337.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	18.74%	-17.70%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	356.51%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and ARMW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 12
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	—	—

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-48.47%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.30%	-8.12%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.96%	-25.32%	+11.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.56%	93.49%	-54.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.38%	93.49%	-51.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.38%	93.49%	-51.11%

LFGY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.45%, more than ARMW's 22.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	22.59%	16.38%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	79.45%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGY and ARMW in my portfolio?

LFGY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LFGY or ARMW?

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFGY or ARMW?

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFGY or ARMW?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 79.45%, compared with 22.59% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between LFGY and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.99% for ARMW.