LFGY vs. ARMW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

LFGY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.

LFGY

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 1Y: -0.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.36%

ARMW

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -28.55%
• 6M: 146.99%
• YTD: 134.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	$3.87M	$4.86M	$4.12M
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	$957.02K	$905.59K	$1.33M

LFGY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	6.34%	-17.70%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	134.95%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and ARMW is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.52

LFGY vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFGY	ARMW
Financial Services	55.3%	-
Technology	34.1%	18.0%
Communication Services	6.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 9
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFGY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	—	—

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-56.50%	+20.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.77%	-52.71%	+33.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-27.18%	+13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.62%	96.03%	-55.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.60%	96.03%	-53.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.60%	96.03%	-53.43%

LFGY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.75%, more than ARMW's 62.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	62.70%	16.38%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.75%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGY and ARMW in my portfolio?

LFGY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LFGY or ARMW?

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFGY or ARMW?

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFGY or ARMW?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.75%, compared with 62.70% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between LFGY and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.99% for ARMW.