PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. AIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGY vs. AIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than AIPI's 10.97% return.


LFGY

1D
0.00%
1M
2.32%
YTD
17.68%
6M
7.03%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPI

1D
0.26%
1M
9.17%
YTD
10.97%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. AIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and AIPI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.69

The correlation between LFGY and AIPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFGY vs. AIPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LFGY
AIPI

Financial Services

55.9%

-

Technology

33.5%
90.9%

Communication Services

6.5%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

LFGY
55.9%
AIPI

-

Technology

LFGY
33.5%
AIPI
90.9%

Communication Services

LFGY
6.5%
AIPI
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LFGY
4.1%
AIPI
3.2%

Basic Materials

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Consumer Defensive

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Energy

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Healthcare

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Industrials

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Real Estate

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Utilities

LFGY

-

AIPI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. AIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPI
AIPI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. AIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFGYAIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.34

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.08

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

6.46

-5.93

LFGY vs. AIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the AIPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and AIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFGYAIPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.88

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.04

-0.90

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. AIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than AIPI's maximum drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and AIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYAIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-25.25%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-14.40%

-21.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.11%

-0.55%

-9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-4.65%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.43%

4.63%

+11.80%

Volatility

LFGY vs. AIPI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI) at 2.86%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGYAIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

2.86%

+7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.08%

12.91%

+17.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.07%

15.91%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.90%

21.37%

+20.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.90%

21.37%

+20.53%

LFGY vs. AIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFGY vs. AIPI - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.56%, more than AIPI's 34.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
34.72%37.84%18.13%
LFGY
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
82.56%94.90%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFGY and AIPI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to AIPI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs AIPI's -25.25%.

On 1-year performance, AIPI leads with 29.84% vs 8.63% for LFGY. On fees, AIPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, AIPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPI has performed better with a 29.84% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.56%, compared with 34.72% for AIPI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LFGY and 0.65% for AIPI.

AIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGY and AIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer