LFBE vs. VGIT
LFBE (LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. LFBE is actively managed, while VGIT is passively managed. Over the past year, LFBE returned -1.56% vs 1.28% for VGIT. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LFBE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
LFBE vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFBE achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than VGIT's -0.61% return.
LFBE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -1.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.37%
VGIT
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 1.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.00K | $2.68K | $1.34K | |
| $130.25M | $142.29M | $175.18M |
LFBE vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFBE LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF | -2.84% | 5.14% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.61% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFBE and VGIT is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LFBE and VGIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFBE vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
LFBE
VGIT
LFBE vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF (LFBE) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFBE | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 0.45 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 1.04 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFBE vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFBE drawdown since its inception was -7.65%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFBE and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFBE | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -16.05% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -2.83% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -2.54% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -3.51% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.23% | +1.86% |
Volatility
LFBE vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF (LFBE) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 0.84%. This indicates that LFBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFBE | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 0.84% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.08% | 2.60% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.99% | 3.20% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 5.39% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 4.49% | +4.75% |
LFBE vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFBE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LFBE vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
LFBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than VGIT's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFBE LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF | 8.49% | 12.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFBE and VGIT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFBE has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to VGIT (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFBE dropped -7.65% vs VGIT's -16.05%.
On 1-year performance, VGIT leads with 1.28% vs -1.56% for LFBE. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 1.28% return vs -1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LFBE.
LFBE has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 3.90% for VGIT.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFBE and 0.03% for VGIT.
VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFBE and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer