PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFBE vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFBE vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF (LFBE) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFBE achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.49% return.


LFBE

1D
-0.74%
1M
-3.48%
6M
-3.19%
YTD
-3.24%
1Y
-1.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.11%

GGOV

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.22%
6M
2.93%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
-0.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.82M$62.54M$76.81M
$4.00K$2.68K$1.31K

LFBE vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFBE and GGOV is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.62

The correlation between LFBE and GGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFBE vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFBE
LFBE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LFBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFBE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LFBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFBE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GGOV
GGOV Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFBE vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF (LFBE) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFBEGGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.01

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

0.01

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.24

0.03

-0.27

LFBE vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFBE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFBE and GGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFBE vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFBE drawdown since its inception was -7.65%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFBE and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFBEGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-4.69%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-4.69%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-1.32%

-5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-1.54%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.15%

+0.91%

Volatility

LFBE vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF (LFBE) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.77%. This indicates that LFBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFBEGGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

0.77%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

3.57%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

5.25%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

5.09%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

5.09%

+4.16%

LFBE vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFBE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFBE vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

LFBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFBE and GGOV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFBE has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to GGOV (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFBE dropped -7.65% vs GGOV's -4.69%.

On 1-year performance, GGOV leads with -0.54% vs -1.97% for LFBE. On fees, LFBE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGOV has performed better with a -0.54% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LFBE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

LFBE has the higher dividend yield at 8.53%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

LFBE is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFBE and 0.39% for GGOV.

GGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFBE and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer