LFAW vs. GGOV
LFAW (LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFAW is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. Over the past year, LFAW returned 3.42% vs 0.46% for GGOV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
LFAW vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFAW achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.69% return.
LFAW
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFAW vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFAW LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF | -0.85% | 3.19% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.69% | -2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFAW and GGOV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between LFAW and GGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFAW vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
LFAW
GGOV
LFAW vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFAW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.02 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.07 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 0.16 | +0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFAW vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFAW drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAW and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFAW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -4.69% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -4.69% | -1.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | -1.12% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -1.54% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.12% | +0.44% |
Volatility
LFAW vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.95%. This indicates that LFAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFAW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 0.95% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.62% | 3.60% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 5.27% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 5.20% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 5.20% | +3.71% |
LFAW vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFAW vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
LFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFAW LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF | 6.47% | 9.85% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFAW and GGOV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFAW has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to GGOV (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAW dropped -11.37% vs GGOV's -4.69%.
On 1-year performance, LFAW leads with 3.42% vs 0.46% for GGOV. On fees, LFAW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFAW has performed better with a 3.42% return vs 0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LFAW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
LFAW has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
LFAW is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAW and 0.39% for GGOV.
LFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFAW and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer