LEXCX vs. EIFVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LEXCX (Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund) and EIFVX (Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX returned 11.73%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for EIFVX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LEXCX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for EIFVX.

Performance

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LEXCX having a 15.98% return and EIFVX slightly higher at 16.51%. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX has underperformed EIFVX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while EIFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.

LEXCX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 6M: 15.38%
• 1Y: 18.10%
• 3Y*: 13.73%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

EIFVX

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 16.51%
• 6M: 15.79%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund	15.98%	7.04%	3.60%	14.53%	3.95%	26.77%	4.36%	21.43%	-5.44%	16.61%
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	16.51%	10.89%	12.44%	8.48%	-3.31%	23.71%	2.23%	37.25%	-6.15%	20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LEXCX and EIFVX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between LEXCX and EIFVX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LEXCX vs. EIFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEXCX

LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 43
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EIFVX

EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 74
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEXCX	EIFVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.46	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.47	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.44	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	3.00	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	12.29	-4.08

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEXCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the EIFVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEXCX and EIFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEXCX drawdown since its inception was -50.42%, which is greater than EIFVX's maximum drawdown of -40.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXCX and EIFVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEXCX	EIFVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.42%	-40.64%	-9.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.22%	-9.93%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	-17.87%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.75%	-17.87%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.21%	-40.64%	+1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	0.00%	-4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-3.83%	-3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.42%	+0.08%

Volatility

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEXCX	EIFVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	4.45%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	9.24%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.09%	12.13%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	15.74%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	18.08%	+0.94%

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEXCX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EIFVX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEXCX vs. EIFVX - Dividend Comparison

LEXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than EIFVX's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	4.79%	5.58%	6.99%	2.92%	4.13%	9.92%	3.05%	7.05%	17.26%	3.57%	2.86%	4.17%
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund	1.42%	1.65%	1.66%	1.58%	1.65%	1.54%	1.91%	1.86%	2.03%	1.79%	3.93%	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEXCX and EIFVX in my portfolio?

LEXCX and EIFVX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEXCX or EIFVX?

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to EIFVX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXCX dropped -50.42% vs EIFVX's -40.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.