PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEXCX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEXCX achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than BUFBX's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.


LEXCX

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
15.98%
6M
15.38%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
11.73%

BUFBX

1D
0.14%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.08%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
15.98%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.19%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LEXCX and BUFBX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 1994

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between LEXCX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEXCX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEXCXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.26

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

11.49

-3.28

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEXCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEXCX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEXCX drawdown since its inception was -50.42%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXCX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEXCXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.42%

-39.78%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-4.45%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-12.85%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.75%

-14.67%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-35.51%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-4.32%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-4.72%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.26%

+1.24%

Volatility

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.41%. This indicates that LEXCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEXCXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.41%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

6.92%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

9.19%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

13.40%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

15.61%

+3.41%

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEXCX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEXCX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

LEXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than BUFBX's 8.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.42%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.42%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEXCX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to BUFBX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXCX dropped -50.42% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEXCX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer