LEO vs. RBLX
LEO (BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.) and RBLX (Roblox Corporation) are both stocks. LEO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while RBLX operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, LEO returned -3.65%/yr vs -14.29%/yr for RBLX. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEO vs. RBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEO achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly higher than RBLX's -56.07% return.
LEO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 9.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.71%
RBLX
- 1D
- -26.85%
- 1M
- -35.75%
- 6M
- -45.86%
- YTD
- -56.07%
- 1Y
- -71.53%
- 3Y*
- -3.35%
- 5Y*
- -14.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.54M | $1.70M | $1.48M | |
| $617.43M | $496.00M | $543.43M |
LEO vs. RBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. | -0.44% | 9.85% | 6.94% | 0.07% | -24.13% | 3.19% |
RBLX Roblox Corporation | -56.07% | 40.04% | 26.55% | 60.65% | -72.41% | 59.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEO and RBLX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
LEO:
$383.09M
RBLX:
$25.49B
LEO:
$0.24
RBLX:
-$1.42
LEO:
6.93
RBLX:
4.43
LEO:
0.91
RBLX:
167.87
LEO:
$55.30M
RBLX:
$5.69B
LEO:
$37.67M
RBLX:
$4.49B
LEO:
$3.53M
RBLX:
-$840.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEO vs. RBLX — Risk / Return Rank
LEO
RBLX
LEO vs. RBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEO | RBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.74 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.99 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | -1.55 | +7.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEO vs. RBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEO drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, smaller than the maximum RBLX drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO and RBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEO | RBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.35% | -82.79% | +35.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -74.85% | +68.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -74.85% | +59.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.53% | -82.79% | +41.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.47% | -74.85% | +55.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -53.27% | +43.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 47.74% | -45.87% |
Volatility
LEO vs. RBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) is 2.53%, while Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a volatility of 33.41%. This indicates that LEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEO | RBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 33.41% | -30.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | 59.42% | -51.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 68.58% | -58.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 70.77% | -58.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 71.06% | -57.19% |
Dividends
LEO vs. RBLX - Dividend Comparison
LEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, while RBLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. | 4.91% | 4.03% | 3.77% | 4.37% | 5.66% | 4.84% | 4.95% | 4.94% | 5.96% | 5.97% | 6.14% | 6.04% |
RBLX Roblox Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LEO vs. RBLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. and Roblox Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEO vs. RBLX - Profitability Comparison
LEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.26M and revenue of 15.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.9%.
RBLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.1%.
LEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.63M and revenue of 15.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.2%.
RBLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roblox Corporation reported an operating income of -229.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.6%.
LEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. reported a net income of 5.22M and revenue of 15.09M, resulting in a net margin of 34.6%.
RBLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a net income of -183.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of -12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEO and RBLX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBLX has higher volatility (33.41%) compared to LEO (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEO dropped -47.35% vs RBLX's -82.79%.
LEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEO and RBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer