LEO vs. HYD
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD).
HYD is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEO or HYD.
Key characteristics
| LEO | HYD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.34% | 4.63% |
| 1Y Return | 20.34% | 11.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.56% | -1.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.49% | -0.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.55% | 3.63% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.99 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.86 | 3.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.54 | 0.69 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.08 | 13.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.80% | 0.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.97% | 5.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.35% | -35.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.02% | -6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEO and HYD is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LEO vs. HYD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LEO achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than HYD's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LEO has underperformed HYD with an annualized return of 2.55%, while HYD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.63% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEO vs. HYD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEO vs. HYD - Dividend Comparison
LEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than HYD's 4.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. | 3.64% | 4.37% | 5.66% | 4.84% | 4.95% | 4.94% | 5.96% | 5.97% | 6.14% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.74% |
HYD VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 4.01% | 4.08% | 14.47% | 4.29% | 4.58% | 4.83% | 4.98% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
LEO vs. HYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEO drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than HYD's maximum drawdown of -35.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO and HYD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEO vs. HYD - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) at 2.17%. This indicates that LEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.