PortfoliosLab logo
LEO vs. HYMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LEO and HYMB is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LEO vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEO:

0.21

HYMB:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

LEO:

0.27

HYMB:

0.32

Omega Ratio

LEO:

1.04

HYMB:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

LEO:

0.05

HYMB:

0.18

Martin Ratio

LEO:

0.32

HYMB:

0.69

Ulcer Index

LEO:

5.22%

HYMB:

2.23%

Daily Std Dev

LEO:

11.39%

HYMB:

6.71%

Max Drawdown

LEO:

-47.35%

HYMB:

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

LEO:

-27.79%

HYMB:

-6.11%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LEO having a -1.93% return and HYMB slightly lower at -1.96%. Over the past 10 years, LEO has underperformed HYMB with an annualized return of 1.78%, while HYMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.54% annualized return.


LEO

YTD

-1.93%

1M

-1.04%

6M

-7.75%

1Y

2.00%

3Y*

-2.09%

5Y*

-0.75%

10Y*

1.78%

HYMB

YTD

-1.96%

1M

0.20%

6M

-3.71%

1Y

2.27%

3Y*

1.63%

5Y*

1.89%

10Y*

2.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEO vs. HYMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEO is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEO is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEO is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEO is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEO is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYMB is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEO vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEO and HYMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LEO vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

LEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than HYMB's 4.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEO
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.
3.91%3.77%4.37%5.66%4.84%4.95%4.94%5.96%5.97%6.14%6.04%7.11%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.49%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%4.49%

Drawdowns

LEO vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEO drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than HYMB's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO and HYMB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LEO vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) at 1.44%. This indicates that LEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...