LEO vs. HYMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEO (BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.) is a stock, while HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Yield. Over the past 10 years, LEO returned 1.04%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for HYMB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEO vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEO achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LEO has underperformed HYMB with an annualized return of 1.04%, while HYMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.

LEO

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 4.01%
• 1Y: 15.46%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: -2.47%
• 10Y*: 1.04%

HYMB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEO vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEO BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.	1.84%	9.85%	6.94%	0.07%	-24.13%	4.53%	5.03%	24.76%	-12.13%	9.07%
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	2.04%	5.52%	7.73%	-15.54%	5.16%	3.74%	9.51%	4.91%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LEO and HYMB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011	0.29

The correlation between LEO and HYMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LEO vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEO

LEO Risk / Return Rank: 80
LEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
LEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LEO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
LEO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

HYMB

HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 53
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEO vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEO	HYMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.84	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.63	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.37	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.40	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	8.51	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEO vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEO and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEO	HYMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.84	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.06	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.22	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.45	-0.14

Drawdowns

LEO vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEO drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than HYMB's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO and HYMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEO	HYMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.35%	-29.57%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.81%	-3.11%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	-7.44%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.53%	-20.15%	-21.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.53%	-29.57%	-11.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.62%	-0.04%	-17.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-3.81%	-5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.88%	+0.92%

Volatility

LEO vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) at 1.35%. This indicates that LEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEO	HYMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	1.35%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	3.14%	+5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.44%	4.05%	+6.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	6.66%	+5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	11.36%	+2.55%

Dividends

LEO vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

LEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, which matches HYMB's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	4.54%	4.55%	4.29%	4.07%	3.77%	3.19%	3.55%	3.95%	4.03%	3.78%	4.08%	4.54%
LEO BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.	4.54%	4.03%	3.77%	4.37%	5.66%	4.84%	4.95%	4.94%	5.96%	5.97%	6.14%	6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEO and HYMB in my portfolio?

LEO and HYMB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEO or HYMB?

LEO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to HYMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEO dropped -47.35% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.