LEND vs. HYLB
LEND (SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. LEND is actively managed, while HYLB is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEND charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
LEND vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LEND
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
LEND vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.74% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEND and HYLB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEND vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
LEND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYLB
LEND vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF (LEND) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEND | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEND vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEND drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEND and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEND | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -22.91% | +22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -2.41% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
LEND vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEND | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 3.74% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 7.48% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 8.15% | -4.77% |
LEND vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEND vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
LEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than HYLB's 6.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.50% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEND and HYLB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEND.
HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 0.98% for LEND.
They also come from different issuers: SEI and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEND and 0.15% for HYLB.
Find the right allocation for LEND and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer