LEN vs. KR
LEN (Lennar Corporation) and KR (The Kroger Co.) are both stocks. LEN operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while KR operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEN returned 7.13%/yr vs 7.14%/yr for KR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEN vs. KR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -18.08% return, which is significantly lower than KR's -5.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LEN having a 7.13% annualized return and KR not far ahead at 7.14%.
LEN
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -28.99%
- YTD
- -18.08%
- 1Y
- -22.82%
- 3Y*
- -10.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.81%
KR
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 1Y
- -16.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
LEN vs. KR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEN Lennar Corporation | -18.08% | -20.80% | -7.32% | 66.92% | -20.64% | 53.99% | 37.97% | 42.96% | -37.91% | 50.28% |
KR The Kroger Co. | -5.63% | 4.25% | 36.91% | 4.99% | 0.44% | 45.41% | 11.90% | 7.90% | 2.08% | -18.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEN and KR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.17 |
The correlation between LEN and KR shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEN:
$20.58B
KR:
$35.75B
LEN:
$7.91
KR:
$1.64
LEN:
10.48
KR:
35.55
LEN:
0.63
KR:
0.25
LEN:
$32.74B
KR:
$148.65B
LEN:
$1.72B
KR:
$34.46B
LEN:
$2.36B
KR:
$5.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEN vs. KR — Risk / Return Rank
LEN
KR
LEN vs. KR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and The Kroger Co. (KR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEN | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.63 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | -1.36 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEN vs. KR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than KR's maximum drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and KR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEN | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.28% | -66.81% | -27.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.39% | -26.16% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.51% | -26.16% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.51% | -31.07% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | -44.13% | -14.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.90% | -22.40% | -31.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -22.44% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.98% | 12.18% | +12.80% |
Volatility
LEN vs. KR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lennar Corporation (LEN) is 11.23%, while The Kroger Co. (KR) has a volatility of 12.65%. This indicates that LEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEN | KR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 12.65% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.31% | 22.82% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.75% | 28.07% | +9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.80% | 27.23% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.44% | 29.16% | +8.28% |
Dividends
LEN vs. KR - Dividend Comparison
LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, which matches KR's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KR The Kroger Co. | 2.40% | 2.14% | 2.00% | 2.41% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.79% | 1.30% | 0.94% |
LEN Lennar Corporation | 2.41% | 1.95% | 1.47% | 1.01% | 1.66% | 0.86% | 0.82% | 0.29% | 0.41% | 0.25% | 0.37% | 0.33% |
Financials
LEN vs. KR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and The Kroger Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEN vs. KR - Profitability Comparison
LEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of -390.70M and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.9%.
KR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 10.63B and revenue of 46.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.
LEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 629.34M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
KR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
LEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 656.43M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
KR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of 903.00M and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEN and KR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KR has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to LEN (11.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEN dropped -94.28% vs KR's -66.81%.
KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEN and KR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer