PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEN vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEN vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 8.57%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


LEN

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-14.11%
6M
-17.47%
1Y
-16.31%
3Y*
-8.22%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
8.57%

KO

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.79%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEN vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEN
Lennar Corporation
-14.11%-20.80%-7.32%66.92%-20.64%53.99%37.97%42.96%-37.91%50.28%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
15.28%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LEN and KO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEN:

$21.21B

KO:

$343.09B

EPS

LEN:

$7.91

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

LEN:

11.06

KO:

25.04

PS Ratio

LEN:

0.66

KO:

6.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEN:

$32.74B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEN:

$1.72B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEN:

$2.36B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEN vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN
LEN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEN vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LENKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.20

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

2.40

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

4.77

-5.49

LEN vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEN vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LENKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.28%

-68.23%

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.39%

-7.87%

-33.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.51%

-16.26%

-38.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.51%

-17.27%

-37.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

-36.99%

-21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.66%

-4.24%

-47.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-16.08%

-10.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.73%

3.95%

+18.78%

Volatility

LEN vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.87%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LENKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

6.87%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.14%

12.72%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.85%

16.75%

+21.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.65%

16.16%

+18.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.37%

18.25%

+19.12%

Dividends

LEN vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than KO's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.62%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
LEN
Lennar Corporation
2.29%1.95%1.47%1.01%1.66%0.86%0.82%0.29%0.41%0.25%0.37%0.33%

Financials

LEN vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B13.00B20222023202420252026
7.94B
12.47B
(LEN) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEN vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
-4.9%
63.0%
Portfolio components
LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of -390.70M and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.9%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 629.34M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 656.43M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LEN and KO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEN has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to KO (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEN dropped -94.28% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEN and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer