PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEN-B vs. PHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEN-B vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN-B achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly lower than PHM's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN-B has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 11.09%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.59% annualized return.


LEN-B

1D
-2.53%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-9.47%
6M
-12.20%
1Y
-14.26%
3Y*
-4.88%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
11.09%

PHM

1D
-1.06%
1M
8.12%
YTD
7.59%
6M
5.91%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
19.76%
10Y*
22.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEN-B vs. PHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEN-B
Lennar Corporation
-9.47%-22.92%-0.04%82.02%-20.04%58.29%38.63%43.24%-39.16%53.36%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
7.59%8.54%6.22%128.76%-19.22%34.03%12.55%51.33%-20.76%83.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LEN-B and PHM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2003

0.82

The correlation between LEN-B and PHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEN-B:

$20.68B

PHM:

$24.35B

EPS

LEN-B:

$7.91

PHM:

$10.36

PE Ratio

LEN-B:

10.78

PHM:

12.12

PS Ratio

LEN-B:

0.65

PHM:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEN-B:

$32.74B

PHM:

$16.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEN-B:

$1.72B

PHM:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEN-B:

$2.36B

PHM:

$2.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEN-B vs. PHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN-B
LEN-B Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LEN-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEN-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEN-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LEN-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEN-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PHM
PHM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEN-B vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEN-BPHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.15

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

1.10

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

2.12

-2.73

LEN-B vs. PHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEN-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN-B and PHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEN-B vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN-B drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN-B and PHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEN-BPHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-92.40%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.29%

-22.60%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.66%

-38.01%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.66%

-38.01%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.05%

-62.11%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.64%

-14.52%

-33.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-35.46%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.13%

11.74%

+11.39%

Volatility

LEN-B vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) at 9.16%. This indicates that LEN-B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEN-BPHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

9.16%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.72%

24.06%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.47%

34.43%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.80%

34.80%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.02%

36.53%

+1.49%

Dividends

LEN-B vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

LEN-B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than PHM's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEN-B
Lennar Corporation
2.35%2.10%1.51%1.12%2.01%1.05%1.02%0.36%0.51%0.30%0.46%0.40%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.80%0.78%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%

Financials

LEN-B vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
7.94B
3.41B
(LEN-B) Total Revenue
(PHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEN-B vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and PulteGroup, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
-4.9%
24.1%
Portfolio components
LEN-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of -390.70M and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.9%.

PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

LEN-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 629.34M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

LEN-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 656.43M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LEN-B and PHM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEN-B has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to PHM (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEN-B dropped -95.76% vs PHM's -92.40%.

PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEN-B and PHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer