LEGR vs. FTXL
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.82%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
LEGR vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 12.39% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.11% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and FTXL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between LEGR and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEGR vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR
FTXL
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
LEGR
FTXL
-
Technology
LEGR
FTXL
Communication Services
LEGR
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR
FTXL
-
Industrials
LEGR
FTXL
Utilities
LEGR
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
LEGR
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
LEGR
FTXL
-
Healthcare
LEGR
FTXL
-
Energy
LEGR
FTXL
-
Real Estate
LEGR
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
FTXL
LEGR vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEGR | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.78 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 15.62 | -12.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 58.28 | -47.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEGR | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 6.33 | -4.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.97 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.94 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -43.87% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -14.51% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -41.57% | +27.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -43.87% | +12.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | 0.00% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -10.56% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.88% | -1.14% |
Volatility
LEGR vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 4.93%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 14.28% | -9.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 28.98% | -17.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 35.94% | -22.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 36.02% | -19.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 34.25% | -13.94% |
LEGR vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and FTXL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 11.82% for LEGR. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while FTXL is Semiconductors. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer