LEGR vs. COZX
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while COZX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. LEGR is passively managed, while COZX is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for COZX.
Performance
LEGR vs. COZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than COZX's 205.40% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
COZX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 78.54%
- YTD
- 205.40%
- 6M
- 125.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR vs. COZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 12.39% | 3.23% |
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF | 205.40% | -61.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and COZX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. COZX — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
COZX
LEGR vs. COZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEGR | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEGR | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.23 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. COZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum COZX drawdown of -70.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and COZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -70.37% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.24% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -44.31% | +37.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility
LEGR vs. COZX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | COZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 138.53% | -124.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 138.53% | -121.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 138.53% | -118.22% |
LEGR vs. COZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than COZX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. COZX - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while COZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and COZX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for COZX.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while COZX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 1.30% for COZX.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and COZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer