PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEG vs. GPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEG vs. GPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -3.16% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed GPC with an annualized return of -11.06%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.83% annualized return.


LEG

1D
-0.75%
1M
15.59%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-7.69%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
-27.77%
5Y*
-24.81%
10Y*
-11.06%

GPC

1D
1.46%
1M
12.93%
YTD
-13.92%
6M
-19.54%
1Y
-10.20%
3Y*
-10.53%
5Y*
-1.48%
10Y*
3.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEG vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
-3.16%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
-13.92%8.70%-13.22%-18.12%26.82%43.39%-2.19%14.05%4.11%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LEG and GPC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.43

The correlation between LEG and GPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEG:

$1.49B

GPC:

$14.32B

EPS

LEG:

$1.60

GPC:

$0.43

PE Ratio

LEG:

6.62

GPC:

239.81

PS Ratio

LEG:

0.49

GPC:

0.58

PB Ratio

LEG:

1.44

GPC:

3.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEG:

$3.03B

GPC:

$24.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEG:

$717.40M

GPC:

$8.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEG:

$433.10M

GPC:

$760.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEG vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GPC
GPC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPC Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEG vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGGPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.95

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.32

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

-0.70

+1.60

LEG vs. GPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEG Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEG and GPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEG vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and GPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGGPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.41%

-54.89%

-31.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.51%

-37.48%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.26%

-40.81%

-36.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.96%

-45.70%

-39.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.41%

-54.89%

-31.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.60%

-38.41%

-39.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.65%

-10.30%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

17.30%

-3.53%

Volatility

LEG vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 8.81%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGGPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.98%

8.81%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.40%

25.18%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.76%

29.19%

+20.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.50%

26.99%

+15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.81%

28.14%

+11.67%

Dividends

LEG vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison

LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than GPC's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
4.03%3.35%3.43%2.74%2.06%2.33%3.15%2.87%3.00%2.84%2.75%2.86%
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
1.42%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%

Financials

LEG vs. GPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B202220232024202520260
6.26B
(LEG) Total Revenue
(GPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LEG and GPC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to GPC (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs GPC's -54.89%.

LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEG and GPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer