LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE
LEER.DE (Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF) and LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LEER.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while LYTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE returned 11.78%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for LYTR.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEER.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYTR.DE.
Performance
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEER.DE achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than LYTR.DE's 18.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE has outperformed LYTR.DE with an annualized return of 11.78%, while LYTR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.
LEER.DE
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 18.61%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 29.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 18.70%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 45.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEER.DE Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF | 17.52% | 53.95% | 4.13% | 41.71% | -21.18% | 20.41% | -18.42% | 1.30% | -8.37% | 30.59% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 18.70% | 17.59% | 13.34% | -15.11% | 27.02% | 52.42% | -19.47% | 14.16% | -6.16% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEER.DE and LYTR.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LEER.DE and LYTR.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LEER.DE
LYTR.DE
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEER.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 3.27 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.34 | 11.51 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEER.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, roughly equal to the maximum LYTR.DE drawdown of -67.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEER.DE and LYTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEER.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.75% | -67.76% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -13.95% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -17.04% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.51% | -30.28% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.74% | -44.61% | -4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -13.23% | +9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.42% | -32.82% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.97% | -0.31% |
Volatility
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) at 4.59%. This indicates that LEER.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEER.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 4.59% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 20.59% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 22.63% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 19.46% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 18.36% | +3.39% |
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEER.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LYTR.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEER.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEER.DE nor LYTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEER.DE and LYTR.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.
LEER.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LYTR.DE is Commodities. LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LEER.DE and 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for LEER.DE and LYTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer