PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEER.DE vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LEER.DE is traded in EUR, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEER.DE achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 29.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LEER.DE having a 11.69% annualized return and ICLN not far behind at 11.32%.


LEER.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
5.04%
YTD
19.93%
6M
24.39%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
31.60%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.69%

ICLN

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
29.29%
6M
28.89%
1Y
61.09%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
19.93%53.95%4.13%41.71%-21.18%20.41%-18.42%1.30%-8.37%30.59%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
29.29%29.60%-20.81%-22.79%0.43%-18.51%121.89%47.62%-4.76%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LEER.DE and ICLN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEER.DE vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEER.DE
LEER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEER.DEICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.91

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

13.46

-0.76

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEER.DE and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEER.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEER.DE and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEER.DEICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.75%

-84.40%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-15.69%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-42.73%

+26.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.51%

-57.06%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.74%

-62.76%

+14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-28.84%

+28.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-57.98%

+27.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

4.55%

-0.92%

Volatility

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) is 6.57%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that LEER.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEER.DEICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

12.22%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

21.55%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

27.08%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

26.01%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

26.55%

-4.70%

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEER.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEER.DE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

LEER.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.28%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEER.DE and ICLN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.

LEER.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LEER.DE and 0.39% for ICLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEER.DE and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer