PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEDS vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEDS vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEDS achieves a 42.00% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LEDS has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of -9.10%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


LEDS

1D
9.23%
1M
32.30%
6M
29.09%
YTD
42.00%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
-4.03%
5Y*
-24.05%
10Y*
-9.10%
ALL TIME*
-26.07%

ITOT

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.09%
6M
8.89%
YTD
10.57%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.60%
ALL TIME*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$209.16M$238.83M$306.83M
$501.30K$6.36M$2.22M

LEDS vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation
42.00%16.28%-7.19%-13.12%-65.37%29.05%80.81%-26.67%-27.61%6.27%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
10.57%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LEDS and ITOT is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.21

The correlation between LEDS and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEDS vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEDS
LEDS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LEDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEDS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LEDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEDS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEDS vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEDSITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

2.23

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

9.56

-9.12

LEDS vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEDS and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEDS vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEDS drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than ITOT's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEDS and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEDSITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.66%

-55.20%

-44.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.63%

-8.90%

-58.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.63%

-19.44%

-48.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.01%

-25.36%

-64.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.05%

-35.00%

-61.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.30%

-1.34%

-97.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.86%

-6.93%

-88.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.08%

2.07%

+38.01%

Volatility

LEDS vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) has a higher volatility of 57.28% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.52%. This indicates that LEDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEDSITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

57.28%

3.52%

+53.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.99%

10.27%

+70.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.17%

13.14%

+91.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.61%

17.47%

+69.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.85%

18.27%

+91.58%

Dividends

LEDS vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

LEDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEDS and ITOT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEDS has higher volatility (57.28%) compared to ITOT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEDS dropped -99.66% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEDS and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer