LDUR vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDUR (PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. LDUR is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LDUR returned 2.43%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. LDUR charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

LDUR vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDUR achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LDUR has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 2.43%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.

LDUR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 2.23%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDUR vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF	0.91%	5.76%	5.14%	4.78%	-4.23%	-0.55%	4.49%	4.27%	1.05%	2.06%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-5.44%	9.67%	-3.43%	35.25%	62.34%	-38.23%	36.01%	-15.30%	15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LDUR and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2014	-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LDUR and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

LDUR vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDUR

LDUR Risk / Return Rank: 88
LDUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LDUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LDUR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LDUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
LDUR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDUR vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDUR	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.23	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	2.73	+1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.38	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.70	5.17	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.64	9.76	+12.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDUR vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDUR Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDUR and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDUR	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.23	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.69	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.37	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.14	+0.73

Drawdowns

LDUR vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDUR drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUR and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDUR	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.68%	-87.06%	+78.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.93%	-17.87%	+16.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-23.75%	+22.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.75%	-33.70%	+26.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.68%	-75.18%	+66.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-10.29%	+10.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-40.17%	+39.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	9.45%	-9.26%

Volatility

LDUR vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) is 0.44%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that LDUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDUR	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	14.22%	-13.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.08%	36.10%	-35.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55%	41.46%	-39.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.03%	35.38%	-33.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.77%	36.68%	-33.91%

LDUR vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDUR has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDUR vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

LDUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF	4.35%	4.60%	4.77%	4.11%	2.22%	0.90%	2.15%	3.14%	2.66%	2.08%	1.85%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDUR and BNO in my portfolio?

LDUR and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDUR or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to LDUR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDUR dropped -8.68% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, LDUR or BNO?

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 2.43% for LDUR. On fees, LDUR is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, LDUR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDUR or BNO?

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDUR or BNO?

LDUR is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDUR or BNO?

LDUR has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between LDUR and BNO?

LDUR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LDUR and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.