PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. ZTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than ZTWO's 0.29% return.


LDSF

1D
-0.00%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

ZTWO

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LDSF vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDSFZTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.74

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

4.28

-1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.60

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.56

-1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.21

20.63

-8.42

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the ZTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and ZTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDSFZTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.74

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

3.24

-2.45

Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and ZTWO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than ZTWO's 4.19% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.61%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.19%4.31%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and ZTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFZTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-0.93%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-0.93%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.49%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-0.10%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.21%

+0.20%

Volatility

LDSF vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) at 0.61%. This indicates that LDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LDSFZTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.61%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

0.89%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

1.53%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

1.50%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

1.50%

+1.70%