PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDSF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


LDSF

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.04%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDSF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
0.74%6.82%4.20%6.53%-5.47%-0.28%2.48%4.52%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%28.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and SPY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019

0.26

The correlation between LDSF and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LDSF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDSF
SPY

Healthcare

100.0%
8.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Healthcare

LDSF
100.0%
SPY
8.4%

Basic Materials

LDSF

-

SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

LDSF

-

SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LDSF

-

SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

LDSF

-

SPY
4.8%

Energy

LDSF

-

SPY
3.6%

Financial Services

LDSF

-

SPY
11.8%

Industrials

LDSF

-

SPY
7.8%

Real Estate

LDSF

-

SPY
1.9%

Technology

LDSF

-

SPY
35.9%

Utilities

LDSF

-

SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDSFSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.16

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

14.72

-2.32

LDSF vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDSFSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.38

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.59

+0.22

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-55.19%

+46.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-8.88%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

-18.76%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

-24.50%

+16.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.70%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-9.05%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.91%

-1.50%

Volatility

LDSF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) is 0.73%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that LDSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDSFSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

2.84%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

8.90%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

11.83%

-9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

17.05%

-13.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.18%

17.94%

-14.76%

LDSF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDSF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.63%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDSF and SPY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to LDSF (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDSF dropped -8.56% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 2.38% for LDSF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LDSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.

LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

LDSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.09% for SPY.

LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDSF and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer