LDSF vs. FCSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDSF (First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF) and FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDSF returned 5.29%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for FCSH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDSF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FCSH.

Performance

LDSF vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than FCSH's 0.67% return.

LDSF

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: 5.29%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: —

FCSH

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDSF vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF	0.74%	6.82%	4.20%	6.53%	-5.47%	0.10%
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	0.67%	6.42%	4.66%	5.45%	-5.87%	0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and FCSH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021	0.67

The correlation between LDSF and FCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDSF vs. FCSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LDSF	FCSH
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LDSF vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF

LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 74
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FCSH

FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 71
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDSF	FCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.21	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.45	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.44	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.48	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.40	12.31	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDSF vs. FCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and FCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDSF	FCSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.21	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.86	-0.06

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. FCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FCSH drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and FCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDSF	FCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.56%	-8.47%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.74%	-1.24%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.74%	-1.32%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.47%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-2.21%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.35%	+0.06%

Volatility

LDSF vs. FCSH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) at 0.60%. This indicates that LDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDSF	FCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	0.60%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	1.53%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06%	1.95%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.08%	2.89%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.18%	2.89%	+0.29%

LDSF vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDSF vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FCSH's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	4.08%	4.14%	4.44%	2.31%	1.76%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF	4.63%	4.52%	4.53%	4.08%	2.61%	1.97%	2.65%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDSF and FCSH in my portfolio?

LDSF and FCSH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDSF or FCSH?

LDSF has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to FCSH (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDSF dropped -8.56% vs FCSH's -8.47%.

Which ETF is better, LDSF or FCSH?

On 3-year performance, LDSF leads with 5.29% vs 5.11% for FCSH. On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDSF or FCSH?

Over the 3-year period, LDSF has performed better with a 5.29% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDSF or FCSH?

FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDSF or FCSH?

LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.08% for FCSH.

What is the main difference between LDSF and FCSH?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.30% for FCSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.