PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDSF vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.37% return.


LDSF

1D
0.10%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*

BSV

1D
0.08%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.68%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDSF vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
0.84%6.82%4.20%6.53%-5.47%-0.28%2.48%4.52%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.37%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and BSV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019

0.51

Over the past year, LDSF and BSV have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDSFBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.74

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

9.60

+2.28

LDSF vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDSFBSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.97

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.85

-0.04

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-8.54%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-1.29%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

-1.53%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

-8.54%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.55%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-0.97%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.37%

+0.04%

Volatility

LDSF vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.53%. This indicates that LDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDSFBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.53%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

1.26%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

1.81%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

2.72%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.18%

2.37%

+0.81%

LDSF vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDSF vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than BSV's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
3.99%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.63%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDSF and BSV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDSF has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to BSV (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDSF dropped -8.56% vs BSV's -8.54%.

On 5-year performance, LDSF leads with 2.40% vs 1.63% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LDSF has performed better with a 2.40% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.

LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.99% for BSV.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.03% for BSV.

LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDSF and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer