LDSF vs. BSV
LDSF (First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both Short-Term Bond funds. LDSF is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDSF returned 2.43%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for BSV. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LDSF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
LDSF vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.52% return.
LDSF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.54%
BSV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $128.14M | $170.40M | $199.65M | |
| $473.02K | $368.98K | $444.23K |
LDSF vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 1.02% | 6.82% | 4.20% | 6.53% | -5.47% | -0.28% | 2.48% | 4.52% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.52% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDSF and BSV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2019 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, LDSF and BSV have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDSF vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
LDSF
BSV
LDSF vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDSF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.92 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 5.92 | +3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDSF vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDSF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -8.54% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.74% | -1.29% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.74% | -1.53% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.83% | -8.39% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.40% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -0.97% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Volatility
LDSF vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.47%. This indicates that LDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDSF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.47% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | 1.41% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 1.71% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 2.74% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 2.38% | +0.78% |
LDSF vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDSF vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than BSV's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.04% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 4.67% | 4.52% | 4.53% | 4.08% | 2.61% | 1.97% | 2.65% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDSF and BSV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LDSF has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to BSV (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDSF dropped -8.56% vs BSV's -8.54%.
On 5-year performance, LDSF leads with 2.43% vs 1.62% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LDSF has performed better with a 2.43% return vs 1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.
LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.04% for BSV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.03% for BSV.
LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDSF and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer